Original Source:http://www.peacedirect.org/using-social-media-to-calm-tensions-in-kashmir/
One morning last February, Kashmiri
peacebuilder Ashima Kaul awoke to news that would send the province into
turmoil. Mohammad Afzal Guru, a Kashmiri militant, had been sentenced
to death in Delhi for his role in the attack on the Indian Parliament
back in 2001. On the streets of Kashmir, people were already
demonstrating in his favour. Messages glorifying his death sprang up on
social network sites. The Government of Jammu and Kashmir had imposed a
curfew and locked down public areas. Newspapers were banned for a time
and internet services were blocked. “People were literally cut off from
all communication. They had no ways or means to express themselves,”
says Ashima.
Her organisation, Yakjah,
which means ‘together’ in Kashmiri, have worked in Kashmir for 11 years
to stop violence and save lives. Afzal Guru’s hanging was a set back to
the process of peacebuilding. It had severely impacted the psyche of
the people, especially Yakjah youth based in the Kashmir Valley. Yakjah had to deal with the huge problem of angry protests involving hundreds of young people.
The hanging of Azfal Guru
unleashed anger, shock and social network outrage. The fact that he had
been executed hurriedly and without warning provoked people in the
Valley to declare him a martyr. He became the face of a ‘resistance
movement’. Social network sites became ablaze with stories and slogans
of his martyrdom. The government’s response fuelled this fire further.
What followed was to rock
the Kashmir Valley and present Yakjah with a real challenge. Curfews,
shutdowns and protests were spreading and youths were being killed in
gunfire. Tensions were increased by the unexplained death of a young
Kashmiri man, who protestors suspected had been murdered by their
political opponents. Rumours started to circulate. Meanwhile a driver
who had ignored strike calls was pelted with stones and killed.
Then in March a suicide
attack killed five unarmed police, whose weapons had been withdrawn by
the authorities to avoid further violence. On national television the
police openly accused the government of making them vulnerable to
attack.
In a bid to calm tensions, Yakjah reached out to young people with the best tool they had
– social network sites. They have a Facebook page where members
interact and share their views. It was through this space that they
reached out to young people to persuade them towards peace. “If social
network sites can be used for inflaming passions,” explains Ashima,
“they can also be used for promoting rationality and peace.” While
stories of Azfal Guru’s martyrdom and aggressive posts about execution
and revenge dominated Facebook, Yakjah sent out alternative messages of
peace.
They immediately faced the
problem of followers who wanted to celebrate Azfal Guru as a martyr. But
as a neutral peacebuilding organisation, they refused to take sides or
politicise the dead.
Yakjah’s group had a direct impact on one young member of the organisation.
He had posted a slogan glorifying Azfal Guru, which Yakjah could not
approve. This created a dilemma, because the student wrote that if his
post was not valued, he would leave the group. This move would remove
him from their influence and heighten his susceptibility to engage in
violence and radicalisation. Ashima decided to persuade him of his
valued place in Yakjah as a volunteer for peacebuilding. As a
consequence, the boy returned to the group, even sharing his poetry. He
is now being encouraged to use his talent to write peace poems.
Yakjah have shown how, in
times of extreme chaos, social media and technology can be used to bring
people together. In the emotional disorder of Kashmir, they saved one
young person who could easily have been influenced by the extremism on
other social network sites. Instead, he emerged stronger and more
determined to fight for peace. Yakjah proves that, together, people can do more for peace.
No comments:
Post a Comment